Arbor UpdateAnn Arbor Area Community News | ||
Regional30,000 State of Michigan employees lose same-sex benefitsUnder pressure from the Republican legislature to comply with Proposal 2, Governor Granholm’s administration will remove same-sex partner benefits from the State of Michigan’s contracts with five unions, representing 30,000 state employees. From the Ann Arbor News: On Wednesday, Granholm aide David Fink said that negotiated contracts scheduled for adoption by the [state Civil Service Commission] on Dec. 15 will be stripped of the same-sex domestic partner benefits. Fink is apparently hoping to avoid a lawsuit that would force the State to comply, and notes that the same-sex benefits could/would be reinstated if court challenges showed the amendment to have overreached. University of Michigan employees are not affected by this action, U-M spokeswoman Julie Peterson this morning said the governor’s action did not change the university’s position. Comment [5] CampusBoyle on Pesick: 'Maniacal', 'One-track-mind'Frequent AU commenter David Boyle takes Michigan Daily editorial page editor, Jason Pesick, to task in the Letters section today. Columnist evokes tyrants to inflate his own image LaborBorder's workers achieve another contract!The tentative contract reported here a few months ago, was ratified by Border’s workers in MN! Yea! Contract negotiations are soon at Store #1. From the email list Work in Progress FIRST EDITION CONTRACT—After almost two years of bargaining, some 21 Borders Books & Music workers in Minneapolis, represented by UFCW Local 789, have a first contract. The agreement, ratified Nov. 14, includes an in-store labor-management committee as well as a grievance and arbitration process. This is the second Borders store nationwide to reach a first contract. and Dear BordersUnion.org registered users and community supporters: Today is World AIDS DayThis just landed in my inbox: AIDS.ORG: World AIDS Day, December 1, 2004 CampusDaily chastises MSA over election resultsThe Michigan Daily today has a front page article noting that, over a week after the Michigan Student Assembly’s official election results were determined, MSA has yet to make any attempt at publicly disseminating those results. The Daily has posted the results on their own website, and also presents some choice quotes from MSA: MSA Vice President Anita Leung, an Engineering senior, said, “It never occurred to us to put it on the website.” MSA Rules and Elections Committee Chair Russ Garber, an LSA junior, said no one would read the results even if they had been posted on the website. Rackham student Darren Easton, an MSA representative, said the assembly should publish a list of successful candidates in some fashion, but added that the Daily should publish the results. “I’m kind of a neophyte to all this electronic stuff — I’m a paper and pencil kind of guy,” he said. For the past several years MSA had counted on student “blog” websites to publish results, said former MSA Vice President Jenny Nathan, an LSA senior. Goodspeed Update the official mouthpiece of MSA? Apparently so. This site had posted the unofficial results of the MSA election and LSA-SG election as they were e-mailed to candidates; the results of the Rackham Student Government elections are on RSG’s website. Comment [14] CampusRecruiters May be Barred from College CampusesCollege campuses win a victory over the Federal government and the Pentagon. Adam Liptak, the New York Times’ legal reporter, writes: Universities may bar military recruiters from their campuses without risking the loss of federal money, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday. Comment [2] National'Blog' Number One Word of the YearVia Reuters: A four-letter term that came to symbolize the difference between old and new media during this year’s presidential campaign tops U.S. dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster’s list of the 10 words of the year. CampusMore Cheap Rides to the AirportStudents who need to get to and from the airport after exams should take advantage of the Michigan Student Assembly’s AirBus program. Students can choose from a flexible schedule of departure times and can also catch a bus back to campus after break. Busses will leave from Bursley (North Campus), Mosher-Jordan (Hill), and State St. by the Law Quad (Central). Tickets can be purchased in advance at the Michigan Union Ticket Office, located on the ground floor of the Union near the food court. Riders may also purchase their tickets at the pickup locations at an increased rate. Winter Break reserve tickets go on sale today. Riders can also purchase tickets at the pickup locations at the time they wish to ride. The service is available to anyone with a valid M-Card. AirBus Links: Comment [1] CampusU-M students plan for Bush inaugurationThe following e-mail has been making its way around campus: CALL TO ACTION—UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN/ANN ARBOR COUNTER-INAUGURATION, JANUARY 20TH, 2005 Comment [12] LocalAnn Arbor revisits city income tax planConsulting firm Plante Moran yesterday delivered their report on a possible city income tax to the City of Ann Arbor. The City Council will consider placing a measure on the ballot in November to create an income tax for those who live or work in Ann Arbor. From the Ann Arbor News: The independent study stated an income tax of 1 percent on residents and businesses and 0.5 percent on non-residents could raise between $905,000 to $18.6 million annually, depending on the size of the exemption set by the City Council for dependents in a household. Property owners – whether homeowners or landlords – would be the clear winners under this plan, while renters, students, and especially commuters would be the losers. City Councilmember Mike Reid (R-2nd) points out that businesses and residents who rent, rather than own, their space could be net losers—renters would pay the new income tax, while landlords would receive the property tax break. The News notes that the City is “hopeful” landlords would lower rents in response to the lower property tax. It can be presumed city officials are also peering out their windows hopefully for a glimpse of the flying pigs. The explicit target of the move is to capture some tax dollars from the University of Michigan, “Look at the U of M,” said Council Member Margie Teall, D-4th Ward. “We don’t collect anything from them.” If University employees are forced to pay income taxes, many may demand higer salaries from the University in order to make up for the lost income—if the University complied, it would have to raise tuitions or cut services in other areas, as extra money from the State is not likely forthcoming. Commuters who live outside of Ann Arbor would receive no benefit from the tax shift, as most of the revenue would be used to pay for existing services, and not for new services that would provide them any new value, like commuter transit. Additionally, the effects of this tax on commuters could be felt in other cities, perhaps diverting money from the City of Detroit’s budget to Ann Arbor, Dave Asker of Plante Moran said a person can’t be fully taxed twice. For example, the study reports that 1,306 Ann Arbor residents commute to Detroit to work, which has a city income tax. Those people, he said, would continue paying Detroit’s income tax but would receive a credit for their Ann Arbor tax. Clearly, the idea of a city income tax is skewed in the favor of local landowners, and would be at best neutral for everyone else who lives or works in Ann Arbor. Admittedly, the City needs to find new and better ways to raise money to meet the demands of the City budget (such as replacing the hemorrhaging municipal water system), but an income tax is not by any means “better”. Perhaps they should instead consider encouraging development (or redevelopment) of underused land and structures in the City: infill development and renovation of unused structures can increase tax revenues with minimal new demands on infrastructure, with the money coming from the owners of the newly valuable structure, and not from students, commuters, and renters in decrepit older housing stock. As a final nail, notice that residents would be charged at a higher rate than non-residents, in effect bribing students to maintain addresses outside of Ann Arbor rather than, say, registering to vote within the city. Comment [5] |
||
New Comments(twitter feed)
Arbor Update Topics
Site Library
|
Local Information
U-M Links
Local Blogs
Movie Showtimes
License
|
|